![]() ![]() ![]() When presented with a hypothetical scenario in which the subjects used in creating Pernkopf's atlas were donated, or unclaimed, but with knowledge that Pernkopf was an active member of the Nazi party, 133 students (72%) retained their original position (p=.001). ![]() ![]() Another 71% of students found the Pernkopf atlas more likely complete and accurate, whereas 76% thought the Netter atlas more useful for learning (p <.001). Of these, 176 (95%) were unaware of the existence of Pernkopf's atlas. The entire first-year class at Drexel University College of Medicine (265 students) was surveyed at approximately the midpoint of their gross anatomy course and 192 responses were collected (72% response rate). medical students, and sought to determine whether medical students view Pernkopf's Topographical Anatomy of Man as a resource of greater accuracy, detail, and potential educational utility as compared to Netter's Atlas of Human Anatomy. We present a discussion of Pernkopf's Atlas: Topographical Anatomy of Man from the perspective of U.S. To date there has been no study reflecting the perceptions of first-year medical students on Eduard Pernkopf's atlas, particularly during their study of gross anatomy and prior to coursework in medical ethics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |